Friday, November 7, 2014

Update: First Essex House District

Dear Friends,

I am not conceding.

The 38 provisional ballots were processed this morning by the Newburyport City Clerk’s office.  In a very thorough and transparent process witnessed by myself, Councilor Kelcourse and others, 23 of these ballots were deemed valid and appropriate for tallying and 15 were deemed invalid.

Of the 23 ballots counted, the net impact on this election is that James Kelcourse's total increased by 2 votes.  Therefore, Councilor Kelcourse holds a lead of 11 votes across the District. 

Over 17,000 voters cast ballots in Amesbury, Newburyport, and Salisbury.  The difference between us is less than 1/10th of 1 percent.

While a timely accounting of ballots is important, the most important result is an accurate accounting of the votes.

Over the weekend, I will be evaluating my options, which include petitioning for a recount, to ensure that the will of the voters has been upheld.


Ed Cameron

Thursday, October 30, 2014


“You worked for me a long time ago.”

The first time the man made an impression on me was a long time ago, probably in 1990.  I was working at the Pine Street Inn homeless shelter in Boston in what was then called the Men’s Unit.  Some of the older homeless men talked about factory and manual labor jobs that they had back in the 1950s and 60s, jobs that just required someone willing to work hard- the ability to run a cash register or a computer or smile at a customer was not required.  The shelter was a tough place, lots of substance abusing men, lots of mentally ill men, and lots of men who had both things going on at the same time.

Our executive director Rich Ring asked me one day to see if there were 8 guys willing to work for a construction company in Hyde Park.  The company was having a hard time finding laborers and needed help for a couple of months.  The Hyde Park District City Councilor knew Rich and thought some homeless guys might want a chance to work.  We were used to politicians coming through especially at election time and Thanksgiving and with TV cameras around.  I wasn’t used to politicians thinking that homeless people might actually want to work.  I asked around and found 20 guys who wanted the gig.  The name of the Councilor stuck in my memory.  

Three years later, as fate would have it, the Councilor became the Acting Mayor, in reality the Action Mayor.  There would be an election.  I wanted to volunteer.  I went to one event in May, got hooked up immediately with the neighborhood activists of Jamaica Plain.  I became “Eddie the Homeless Guy” and we did a lot for the Action Mayor.  The best political meetings of all time happen at Doyle’s.

The Acting Mayor became the Mayor, confirmed on Election Day by the voters.  The next day I got a call from one of the JP coordinators, “Eddie, get me your resume.”

“I wasn’t doing it for a job.  I volunteered because I like him.”

Two years later, I was looking to do something different and there was a City job open doing homeless and hunger work in the Mayor’s Office.  Eight years of seeing a lot of people coming through the shelter with the same problems - no home no job no peace no rest in the words of Bruce Springsteen –made me want to work on the problems of homelessness in a different way.

I worked for the Mayor for seven years.  The org chart wasn’t pretty but it was flat with something like 40 department heads reporting directly to the Mayor.  It’s amazing what can get done when the Boss has his or her ear to the ground, when you’ve got good people pulling in the same direction.  Harvard Business School will do the case study someday. 

Besides having the opportunity to do great work on behalf of homeless families and individuals, I got to do some very very cool things.  I sat for lunch at a small table with the Mayor and Angela….and Ted Kennedy and Vickie Kennedy.  

I got to emcee a homeless advocacy event, protesting a state policy….on the field of Fenway Park on an August afternoon in front of 300 homeless advocates, the Mayor and Angela Menino, Larry Lucchino, Jason Varitek, and Dick Williams.  I have a picture and my catcher’s mitt autographed by Jason to prove it.  It doesn’t get any more surreal than baseball and homelessness.

Bald Guy at podium is Ed Cameron.  Mayor Menino is center with Larry Lucchino to his left and Angela Menino

Nothing is more surreal unless it’s basketball and hunger.  To promote the Can Share Food Drive, we got Celtics forward Walter McCarty to attend.  The Boston Celtics organization was up for sale; a very nice man named Wyc Grousbeck, who was finalizing the deal to take over and didn’t want to be recognized, showed up at our event.  When I met the Mayor at his car, I told him who was there and asked what he thought of the rumored deal.  “$360 Million is too much to pay.  You can’t make money owning the team unless you own the building.” Yes, the Mayor was savvy.  

Despite the reputation for gruffness, I only got chewed out once.  “Why are we doing this event on a Saturday afternoon?,” he growled at me when I met his car before another hunger event.  “Because your scheduler said you were booked all week,” I said.  He accepted it; he wasn’t concerned about working on a Saturday because he worked every day.  He wanted there to be as many people as possible to promote the Food Drive. 

The Urban Mechanic sweated the small stuff because you’ve got to do the small stuff right before you can tackle the big stuff.  

In 2002, I left the Mayor and the City of Boston to get married and move to Newburyport.  I work in Lowell now.  I ran for the Newburyport City Council in my new hometown in 2007, saw the Mayor at an event in Boston, and asked him if he had any advice.  “Work hahd.”  And if you’ve ever heard him speak, you know exactly how that sounded.  I won doing it his way - one door, one voter at a time.

I last saw the Mayor in the Fall of 2013 at a recognition event to honor him.  He was still in charge waiting for the new Mayor to be chosen in a few weeks.  I went up through the crowd to say hello.
“You worked for me a long time ago,” he said.

“Yes, I did, Mr. Mayor.”  And we had worked hard.

Some people make such a strong impression, touch so many lives that they don’t ever really die.  Tom Menino is one of those.  Rest in peace.

Eddie "The Homeless Guy" Cameron

Sunday, October 5, 2014

From City of Newburyport: Extended Fall Hours at Yard Waste Facility to begin on Sunday October 5

Extended Fall Hours at Yard Waste Facility to begin on Sunday October 5

Saturday, October 4, 2014

Question 2 Expanding the Bottle Bill


We need to stop litter and keep Massachusetts clean.
A YES vote on Question 2 will do that by finally updating a successful 32-year-old law (the 1982 “Bottle Bill”) to include five cent deposits on water bottles, iced tea bottles, and sports drinks. Here are the facts about Question 2:
  • A recent Boston Globe poll documented 62% public support for updating the bottle bill. Many local and state environmental and civic organizations are leading the charge on Yes on 2, including Sierra Club, Mass Audubon, Environmental League of Massachusetts, League of Women Voters of Massachusetts, and MASSPIRG. The Updated Bottle Bill has been endorsed by 400 small businesses, and 209 cities and towns passed resolutions in favor of it.
  • Currently, 80% of bottles and cans with a deposit on them are recycled, while only 23% of containers without a deposit are recycled. The rest of those containers become litter or end up in landfills and incinerators.
  • When we began returning bottles for a deposit over 30 years ago, soda and beer bottles and cans were the litter problem. Beverages like bottled water, sports drinks, and iced teas were not widely on the market. We need to update the bill so more beverage containers will be recycled rather than ending up as litter.
  • The updated Bottle Bill will save our cities and towns approximately $6.7 million a year—or an average of $1 per person in our state–in litter pick up and trash disposal costs. You can find those figures in the Department of Environmental Protection’s study here. It also will mean less waste going to landfills and incinerators. And any unclaimed deposits will go to a state fund earmarked for recycling and environmental purposes.
  • While YES on 2 has huge public support, corporations that make big profits selling water and sports drinks have been working to block the measure for years. They’ve already put in $5.5 million dollars to defeat Question 2. Among those against this bill in the Legislature: Coca-Cola, Polar Beverages, Ocean Spray, and others.

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

July 4th Trash and Recycling Information

Important Holiday Schedule Information for Trash and Recycling Disposal and Yard Waste Facility

Newburyport --There will be no trash or recycling pick up on Friday, July 4th   Friday’s trash pick-up will therefore be on Saturday, July 5. This includes the downtown district. 

The Municipal Yard Waste Facility on Crow Lane will be closed on Friday, July 4, 2014 for the holiday. It will re-open on Saturday, July 5 with normal business hours of 7:30am -2:30 pm.  Please do not drop off brush or debris at the gate or on the road when the facility is closed.

The Crow Lane Recycling Center will be open on Saturday, July 5 from 8 am to 12 pm for the monthly recycling of oil paint, motor oil, tires, electronics, bicycles, Styrofoam, anti-freeze, cardboard, tires, and rechargeable batteries.  Our yearly household hazardous waste day will take place on Saturday, September 13 for disposal of household chemicals.   Again, please do not drop off any material at the recycling center when it is closed.

The FY 2014-2015 Health Department brochure which includes the yearly trash and recycling calendar should have arrived at your home in late May. If you did not receive it is available on line at
If you need any additional information please call the Health Department at 978-465-4410 or Mello Disposal at 978-352-8581

Wednesday, June 25, 2014

New Website and Facebook Page

My new website is up at – you can find everything about my race for State Representative there. Please visit the site and please follow my Facebook Page:


Ed Cameron

Thursday, May 1, 2014

Massachusetts Sierra Club: Letter to Council re Plastic Bag Ban

The Council received this letter from the Massachusetts Sierra Club:

Massachusetts Sierra Club
10 Milk Street, Suite 417
Boston MA 02108-4600

April 30, 2014

City Council President Thomas F. O’Brien
and Newburyport City Council Members
Newburyport City Hall
60 Pleasant Street
Newburyport, Massachusetts 01950

Re: “Good Intentions Aren’t Enough” but Action Is

Dear Council President O’Brien and Honorable Members of the City Council,

In the debate concerning plastic bags, there have been many diverse and
sometimes extreme opinions. One of these opinions, the theme of which was
“Good intentions aren’t enough,” was submitted as an open letter to the city
council. The author claims to support “reduction of single use items” and “Reduce,
Reuse, Recycle.” I am pleased to find that we do agree on the fact that “reduction
of single use items is something we should strive to achieve” and that “Reduce,
Reuse, Recycle” needs to be taken to heart.”

However, after that, it appears that the author is misinformed. It has been proven
that a reduction of plastic bags will have a significant positive impact on our
environment and better our quality of life. The United Nations Environment
Programme (UNEP) estimates that there are 46,000 pieces of plastic litter floating
in every square mile of ocean. According to the EPA,” Marine debris impacts the
environment, economy, and human health and safety.” Due to the aerodynamic
nature of plastic bags, a large percentage of this debris is derived from plastic bags.

I’ve noted the author’s reference to David Laist’s study on marine animals with
interest. On the surface, the statement does not appear to be agreement with the
EPA, who further state, “whales and sea turtles often mistake plastic bags for
squid... Moreover, a study of 38 green turtles found that 61 percent had ingested
some form of marine debris including plastic bags, cloth, and rope or string.”
“Seabirds, sea turtles, fish, and marine mammals often ingest marine debris that
they mistake for food. Ingesting marine debris can seriously harm marine life”
because “Ingestion can lead to starvation or malnutrition.”

Another study determined that “up to 10% of plastics produced end up in the oceans, where they
may persist and accumulate.” This validates the fact that a significant percent of
marine debris is plastic. And most importantly, Mr. Laist in both his published
writings and direct communications disclaims the quotes that the author
attributed to him. Mr. Laist has been outspoken in his writings of the dangers that
plastic bags pose. In his article, Overview of the Biological Effects of Lost and
Discarded Plastic Debris in the Marine Environment, he is quite clear that the
proliferation of discarded plastics represent a serious long lasting threat to many
types of marine mammals, fish, birds, turtles, and all other marine life.

While plastic bags are heralded as economical and convenient, in the U.S. alone
BILLIONS of plastic bags end up yearly as litter, causing a visible blight and a
irreversible toxic danger. Plastic bags are so aerodynamic and easily transported by
wind and water, that even when properly disposed of, they often blow away and
become litter. Plastic bags are the third largest form of litter from land-based
sources found on US coasts. According to numerous studies, plastic pollution
litters our coast from Crane’s Beach to Cape Cod National Seashore, to the South

Regarding the question of whether it is the “improper discarding” rather than the
“production and use” of plastic bags that is the problem, many locations and
opportunities are provided for recycling of these bags. The assumption that
providing more opportunities to recycle will resolve the issue is false. Due to the
low value of plastic bags, only 5.2% of our plastic bags are recycled.6 But even if the
recycling rate were doubled, tripled, or more the end result would still have an
unacceptable negative impact.

Certainly, a reduction in the use of thin film plastic bags will be accompanied by
an increase in the use of cloth bags as well as reusable plastic and paper bags.
Cloth bags can be reused hundreds of times and are easy to wash. Concerns about
public health are overblown. In fact, there is only one documented incident where
consumer health was affected by food-borne bacteria resulting from being
transported in a reusable bag. The report makes it clear that the incident would
have been easily avoided by following the most basic food handling techniques,
ands that the bag was not the culprit. Even that claim is non-applicable to the
proposed ordinance. Under proposal in Newburyport, plastic bags in the produce
and meats department will still be provided for groceries; only carry-out bags
would be eliminated.

While paper bags may not be the optimal solution for shopping, the EPA indicates
that paper and paperboard were recycled at a rate of 65% in 2008.There are no
figures for paper bags alone, but this is more than thirteen times the rate of
recycling of plastic bags making this an environmental choice.

The economic fears that opponents play on are also unfounded. For over 20 years,
Nantucket has upheld a ban to counter the effects of plastic bags on its
communities and other towns are following suit. None of these communities has
experienced negative economic consequences. Indeed, Brookline, Manchester by
the Sea, Great Barrington and Nantucket are all thriving communities.

Plastics take hundreds of years to break down at sea and most types never truly
biodegrade. Plastic bag litter is a serious problem and poses a threat to our
environment, but there is an easy solution. Passing a plastic bag ordinance will
help save countless endangered species, reduce pollution, and diminish litter that
inundates our oceans, landfills, and streets. The plastic bag issue is far clearer than
opponents of this ordinance would have you believe, I conclude that while “Good
intentions aren’t good enough,” action is. It’s time for Newburyport to pass an
ordinance banning plastic bags.


Phillip Sego
Environmental Advocate
Massachusetts Sierra Club

Saturday, April 26, 2014


Sunday, April 27 at 3pm Firehouse FREEEEE the Newburyport Literary Festival winds down on Sunday

Come to hear great poetry and see/hear Ed Cameron channel his inner Bruce Springsteen...I promise it will be edgy;-).  Will it be Born to Run, Thunder Road, The Rising or something completely different?

From the High School Press Release:

Newburyport High School is revving up for National Poetry Month in April. For the past 11 years, the creative writing class has sponsored the Favorite Poem Project of Greater Newburyport.

The brainchild of former U.S. Poet Laureate Robert Pinsky, the National Favorite Poem Project was launched in 1997 to celebrate the sheer pleasure of poetry with the public at large. Pinsky put out a call for favorite poems and received 18,000 responses from Americans of diverse regions, ages and backgrounds. "While our local attempts have not been quite so fruitful, we have managed to get a good response from an interesting cross-section of our community every year," says NHS English and creative writing teacher Deborah Szabo.

"In the past, we have particularly enjoyed hearing from our elected leaders and other people of prominence in our community, as well as children, retirees, teachers, students, parents, ‘townies,’ recent immigrants, business people, clergy, artists, and most anyone else," Szabo says.

A representative sample of poems will be chosen for a public reading on Sunday, April 27 at 3 p.m. at the Firehouse at the conclusion of the Newburyport Literary Festival. Poems may be old or modern, famous or obscure, English or another language with a translation, but they should not be written by Favorite Poem Project participants.

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

Shoeman Water Project

Dear Newburyport families and friends,

The students of Newburyport have collected, bound, and bagged over 4,000 pairs of shoes since March 3rd. We promised the Shoeman Water Project, a non-profit organization, that we could easily collect 5,000+ pairs. We know that we can get to our goal.  Over the vacation, please empty your closets of gently used shoes (all types) and drop them off at the following locations.

Locations are
  • in front of the Superintendent’s office,
  • the Nock Middle School office, 
  • and other school offices.  
If that is not convenient for you during vacation, please have your son/daughter bring them in to school April 28th. The shoe drive ends on May 1st with our 6th graders participating in a Walk-a-Thon.

As a community, we are confident that our efforts will alleviate the pressures of those living without clean water.
Thank you.
If you have any questions, please  email:  or

Thursday, April 10, 2014

Sierra Club on Plastic Bags

This is the Sierra Club's testimony last year on a House bill on plastic bags....and the testimony highlights several of the points of controversy in the Newburyport discussion.  The bill is still in committee in the House.

I made a few highlights of my own.


Massachusetts Sierra Club
10 Milk Street, Suite 632
Boston MA 02103-4621

July 3, 2013

Chairwoman Anne M. Gobi
Joint Committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture
State House, Room 473F, Boston, MA 02133

Chairman Marc R. Pacheco
Joint Committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture
State House, Room 312B, Boston, MA 02133

Re: Sierra Club Testimony in support of H787, Related to Plastic Carryout Bags

Dear Chairwoman Gobi, Chairman Pacheco, and Honorable Members of the Committee,

On April 22, 2013, the Sierra Club testified before this committee in support of a ban on
plastic bags. The bill was reported favorably by the committee. The Sierra Club
enthusiastically supports this action. Below is a short description of the main differences
between H787 and H3438 (the bill that was recommended favorably by this committee).
Thank you Chairwoman Gobi, Chairman Pacheco, and Members of the Committee for
providing this opportunity to offer our comments on bills H787 and H3438, related to
reducing the use of plastic checkout bags in Massachusetts. We wish to express our support
in favor of this legislation.

The Sierra Club is the oldest and largest grassroots non-profit and non-partisan
environmental organization in the country, with over 1.4 million members and supporters
nationwide. Its chapter in Massachusetts has over 22,000 members throughout the state and
a history of protecting the environment that spans more than forty years. We work to create
healthy, vibrant communities through support of clean air and water; clean energy; recycling
and waste-elimination; and the preservation of the Commonwealth’s most treasured forests,
parks and open spaces.

There are differences between H.787, the filing by Rep. Denise Provost, and H3438. We
hope that the legislature will consider these proposals.

Bag Thickness: H3438 allows an exemption of plastic bags with a thickness of greater than
2.25 mils (thousandths of an inch). Further research shows that some single-use disposable
plastic bags could be improperly exempted, thus bypassing this bill’s intent. The Sierra Club
recommends consideration of Rep. Provost’s suggested standard of 3.0 mils.
Store Exemptions: The Sierra Club has been contacted by small stores that seem to fall
into a gray area of regulation. Rather than allowing the state to get unnecessarily bogged
down with a difficult regulatory situation, the Sierra Club recommends amending H3438 by
adopting Rep. Provost’s suggested definition of retail stores, thereby eliminating the
confusion surrounding store exemptions.

Possible Bioplastic Exemptions: The Sierra Club has been made aware that the bioplastic
specified in H3438 as exempt is not currently available in North America. We therefore
recommend amending H3438 by adopting Rep. Provost’s suggested no-bioplastic

Below is the testimony as submitted on April 22, 2013.
These bills would ban polyethylene and other types of plastic carryout bags in retail stores. It
would not limit other types of bags, such as those used in a market’s vegetable aisle.
Plastic bags cost society a lot more than the price retailers are currently paying to provide
them. There is no need for this environmental expense. Simple alternatives such as reusable
shopping bags are available and already used in many stores throughout Massachusetts.
Single-use plastic carryout bags should be banned because:
• Plastic bags are so light and capture airflow so well that even when properly
disposed of, they often blow away and become litter. Plastic bags are a unique form
of litter in that they can end up tangled in trees, causing visual blight and other
problems. The City of Los Angeles found that plastic bags account for 25% of litter in
their storm drains. Bags easily escape from garbage trucks, landfills, boats, and the
hands of everyday consumers – and are then carried into lakes and waterways, and
eventually into the ocean. Plastic bags make up the third most prevalent type of litter
from land-based sources found on U.S. coasts.
• Plastic bags harm wildlife. The bags are often mistaken as food by both
domesticated and wild animals. Birds may also use them for nesting material with
dangerous results. Untold numbers of animals die per year by ingesting plastic
bags. These animals typically suffer painful deaths, choking on the plastic or having
it impede digestion Plastic bags entangle and sometimes strangle turtles,
whales, sea lions, seals, birds, and fish among other species.  Many of these
animals are already threatened due to over-fishing and/or habitat loss. The list of
local animals threatened by plastic bags includes green turtles that nest on
Nantucket and right whales that feed off the Massachusetts coast line.
• Plastic bags do not biodegrade and although they do break apart through
mechanical action and photodegradation in the presence of light, these processes
take up to 1000 years to complete. When the bags finally do break down, they do not
dissolve into benign substances; they just fracture into smaller and smaller bits called
“microplastics.” These small particles present a tremendous long-term danger, as
these particles displace food supplies in our oceans. They have a nearly identical
density of seawater so their removal is not possible. Once microplastics enter our
oceans, they will stay there.
Only 5.2% of our plastic bags are recycled. This problem requires a nonrecycling
solution primarily because plastic bags are an extremely low-value product.
The difficulty in collecting, sorting and controlling for the quality of plastic bags makes
recycling this product cost-prohibitive.

For all of the above reasons, single-use plastic bag consumption needs to be heavily
reduced. Because plastic bags are virtually cost-free and convenient, legislation will be
necessary in order to change the behavior of consumers and the retail industry. Voluntary
efforts thus far have come up short.

All these noted bills allow the use of paper bags without any fees or restrictions. In our
region, almost all paper bags are made up of 80% recycled content – some have 100%
recycled content. They’re also recycled by consumers at a very high rate, enjoying an
existing structure to recycle them efficiently. Although paper has a higher initial CO2
footprint, it doesn’t kill animals, persist in the environment, or wreak the kind of permanent
environmental damage that plastics do.

H.696 proposes exceptions for two types of plastics derived from organic sources: ASTM
D6400, specifying a compostable plastic which breaks down into CO2 and water, and ASTM
D7081, which does the same in a marine environment. While both of these types of bags
biodegrade, they are not without significant drawbacks. They are made from starchy plant
materials, typically corn. Using these to circumvent our current habit of HDPE bags would
divert badly needed resources from the agricultural system. Our use of ethanol in gasoline
drove up corn prices outside the US, and making our plastic bags out of corn would
undoubtedly have a similar effect. The real answer lies with decreasing our dependency on
all disposable single-use bags.

A number of manufacturers are promoting so-called “oxo-degradable” or ASTM D5272 bags.
ASTM D5272 does not measure the environmental aspects of the product, but only its ability
to withstand sunlight exposure. ASTM D5272 bags are NOT biodegradable, but simply
degradable – meaning that they break into small bits. Furthermore, it appears that the vast
majority of these bags are made from HDPE (in varying percentages). Although some
companies promote their ASTM D5272 bags as degrading into non-toxic or inert particles,
this does not mean they are environmentally benign.

As a response to public pressure against plastic bags, on March 12, 2009, the Mass Food
Association entered a voluntary agreement with the Mass DEP to commit major
supermarkets to a 33% decrease in plastic bag use by the year 2013. A 33% reduction, if
realized, would rank us last in effectiveness among all places that have enacted ANY
regulation concerning plastic bags – even below Botswana and Burma. However, the Sierra
Club has received reports from across the state of no change in behavior at supermarkets.
No evidence has been provided to support a change in the industry, nor has an independent
body verified any change in bag use. Additionally, the performance data referenced to
support voluntary action is gathered by the supermarkets’ lobby firm and is not audited.
An inspection of many checkout stations at Star Market, Stop and Shop, and Home Depot
clearly show that only plastic bags are available – not paper. Observers have noted that
supermarket cashiers still regularly double bag groceries, and place bulky items with
handles, such as boxes of detergent, in plastic bags. Whatever training being done to help
achieve this voluntary goal is not having a meaningful impact.

Even if we were to achieve a 33% reduction in plastic checkout bag use, we would still have
67% of these bags adrift in the waste stream and in the environment. The very reason to
decrease plastic bag use is that they enter the environment and wreak havoc on wildlife.
Around the world, when plastic bag bans are implemented, the next day, nothing bad
happens. People still shop for groceries. Some of them bring reusable bags, some buy cloth
bags, some use paper. People don’t buy fewer groceries.

Legislation is a realistic solution. Plastic bag bans or surcharges have already been put in
place in countries, provinces and cities all over the world, including: Brookline MA,
Manchester MA, Nantucket MA, as well as China, Canada, Israel, Belgium, Italy, Ireland,
Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore, Botswana, Kenya, Tanzania, South Africa, Thailand, several
states in India, three states and territories of Australia, 30 rural villages in Alaska, Westport
CT, Edmond WA, Bangladesh, Malawi, Germany, Sweden, Paris, San Francisco, Oakland,
Washington DC, Brownsville TX, Mexico City, North Carolina’s Outer Banks Region, and for
the past 20 years, Nantucket Island.

Single use plastic bags are contributing to serious issues facing Massachusetts, the United
States and the World, including energy production, public health, global warming, and
species conservation. Tackling these issues will require the culmination of many small
actions bring about large change. Banning plastic bags is an important and easily
implemented step towards meaningful change.

The Sierra Club has long been committed to minimizing the negative environmental impact
of human activity and because this legislation would significantly reduce such impact from
plastic bags we hope this committee will report these bills favorably.

Ryan Black
Massachusetts Sierra Club

Sunday, March 23, 2014

Running to Represent Amesbury, Newburyport, and Salisbury

As you probably know, State Representative Mike Costello announced this past Wednesday that he will not be running for reelection to the First Essex District this November.

I am announcing that I will be a candidate for this House seat.

Thursday’s article in the Daily News linked here provides a great summary of what Mike has meant to the district.

Mike has been a true champion on issues for Amesbury, Newburyport, and Salisbury.

He has been instrumental in providing State support for bridges, roundabouts, beaches, boardwalks, rail trails, and other important elements that make our communities strong.

I can do a good job representing the citizens of these three communities.

My experience as a Newburyport City Councillor has given me an understanding of where State government needs to do better to sustain local communities, particularly with general local aid, Chapter 70 educational aid, and Chapter 90 transportation funds for local street and sidewalk improvements.

My experience in the nonprofit sector has given me an understanding of how challenging it can be for families to raise and educate their children, find housing they can afford, and get to work on inadequate highways, trains and buses.

Mike has been a strong advocate for us and we’re very fortunate to have Senator Katy O’Connor-Ives represent us in the State Senate.

I want to earn your vote over the next several months. And I do ask for your support. More importantly I respectfully ask for your input on what issues are important to you.

You can click on this link to give me your ideas.

I will make a formal announcement in the next few days and begin to collect signatures over the next few weeks. Please let me know if you have any questions or suggestions or want to help.

Thank you,

Ed Cameron